Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golgari Midrange | vitorcarvalho01 | 7-2 | None |
| Golgari Midrange | dr4ken | 6-2 | None |
| Golgari Midrange | vitorcarvalho01 | 4-2 | None |
| Golgari Midrange | joseph ocasio | 2-1 | None |
| Selesnya Cage | barnyard | 5-3 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , 5 Color Caves , 5 Color Legends , Abzan Beanstalk , Bant Gearhulk , Domain Zur Overlords , Elves , Golgari Beanstalk , Golgari Demons
Meta Performance Analysis
Thrun, Breaker of Silence ranks #323 out of approximately 344 cards in raw efficiency (top 94%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Green average: 48.9%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Thrun, Breaker of Silence is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 3.37 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 5 mana, the average win rate in the format is 68.0%. Thrun, Breaker of Silence has a win rate of 59.0%, making it 13.3% worse than other 5-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrenn and Realmbreaker | Legendary Planeswalker — Wrenn | 16 | 58.5% | 1 |
| Season of Gathering | Sorcery | 5 | 57.4% | 1 |
| Mazemind Tome | Artifact | 7 | 56.3% | 0 |
| Analyze the Pollen | Sorcery | 6 | 54.8% | 0 |
| Up the Beanstalk | Enchantment | 10 | 54.5% | 2 |
| The Aetherspark | Legendary Artifact Planeswalker — Equipment | 13 | 54.4% | 0 |
| Royal Treatment | Instant | 6 | 53.7% | 0 |
| The Filigree Sylex | Legendary Artifact | 25 | 51.9% | 4 |
| Keen-Eyed Curator | Creature — Raccoon Scout | 9 | 51.7% | 0 |
| Outrageous Robbery | Instant | 10 | 51.5% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Thrun, Breaker of Silence than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Choking Miasma | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 68.8% | 64.5% | +4.3% |
| Shoot the Sheriff | Instant | 2 | 5 | 64.5% | 64.7% | -0.2% |
| Wrenn and Realmbreaker | Legendary Planeswalker — Wrenn | 3 | 5 | 57.6% | 58.3% | -0.7% |
| Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 11 | 61.1% | 63.8% | -2.7% |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 6 | 61.5% | 64.2% | -2.7% |
| Tranquil Frillback | Creature — Dinosaur | 3 | 9 | 59.2% | 61.9% | -2.7% |
| Llanowar Elves | Creature — Elf Druid | 1 | 11 | 59.7% | 62.9% | -3.2% |
| Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 11 | 60.8% | 64.2% | -3.4% |
| Gix's Command | Sorcery | 5 | 11 | 59.4% | 63.6% | -4.2% |
| Sentinel of the Nameless City | Creature — Merfolk Warrior Scout | 3 | 10 | 59.4% | 63.6% | -4.3% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golgari Midrange | 455 | 58.9% | 43.6% |
| Golgari Demons | 168 | 30.8% | 46.1% |
| Selesnya Cage | 52 | 20.8% | 52.0% |
| Domain Zur Overlords | 23 | 1.8% | 37.1% |
| Unknown Archetype | 13 | 4.1% | 20.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.